System variables are crucial factors within the criminal justice system that can significantly influence the accuracy and reliability of eyewitness evidence. These variables are directly under the control of law enforcement and legal professionals, making them amenable to reform and improvement through policy and training.
Understanding System Variables
System variables are specific aspects of an investigation that are directly under the control of the criminal justice system. They influence the accuracy of eyewitness evidence and, unlike "estimator variables" (which relate to the witness or event itself and cannot be controlled, such as lighting conditions or witness stress), system variables can be managed and improved through proper protocols and training. They include the way in which the police question a witness and the procedures for asking a witness to identify a perpetrator in an identification parade.
Key Examples of System Variables in Eyewitness Identification
Effective management of these variables can significantly reduce the risk of wrongful convictions based on faulty eyewitness testimony. Here are some primary examples:
1. Witness Questioning Techniques
The manner in which police question a witness is a paramount system variable. Inappropriate or suggestive questioning can inadvertently alter a witness's memory or lead them to believe they saw something that didn't occur.
-
Best Practices:
- Open-Ended Questions: Using non-leading questions that allow the witness to recount events in their own words (e.g., "Tell me everything you remember").
- Cognitive Interview Techniques: Employing scientifically-backed methods designed to enhance memory recall by encouraging detailed narratives and minimizing external interference.
- Avoiding Suggestive Questions: Refraining from questions that imply details or suggest a particular answer (e.g., "Was the assailant wearing a red hat?" vs. "Did you notice anything about the assailant's headwear?").
-
Practical Insight: Poor questioning can contaminate a witness's memory, leading to an inaccurate or biased recollection that impacts subsequent identification efforts.
2. Identification Procedures (Lineups and Photo Arrays)
The procedures for asking a witness to identify a perpetrator in an identification parade (or "lineup") are among the most critical system variables. These procedures must minimize suggestiveness to ensure reliable identification.
Lineup Administration
The method by which a lineup is presented to a witness plays a crucial role.
- Double-Blind Administration: This is a gold standard where neither the witness nor the administrator of the lineup knows who the suspect is. This prevents the administrator from unintentionally providing cues to the witness, even subtle body language.
- Pre-Lineup Instructions: Witnesses should be explicitly informed that the perpetrator may or may not be present in the lineup and that it is just as important to clear an innocent person as it is to identify the guilty party. This reduces the pressure on the witness to make a selection.
Lineup Construction
The composition of the lineup itself is vital.
- Filler Selection: "Fillers" (non-suspect individuals or photos) should be chosen to resemble the suspect in general physical characteristics, such as age, race, and distinctive features. This ensures the suspect does not unduly stand out.
- Sequential Presentation: Presenting individuals or photos one at a time, rather than simultaneously, can encourage witnesses to compare each person to their memory of the perpetrator, rather than comparing lineup members to each other and picking the one who looks "most like" the perpetrator.
Confidence Statements
- Documenting Confidence: Immediately after an identification (or non-identification), the witness's statement of confidence should be recorded verbatim. This initial statement is the most reliable measure of confidence, as confidence can be inflated by external feedback or repeated questioning over time.
3. Mugshot Viewing and Show-up Procedures
Other identification methods also fall under system variables, requiring careful protocols.
- Mugshot Viewing: When witnesses view mugshot books or photo databases, protocols should prevent repeated exposure to the same suspect's photo, which can increase the likelihood of identification based on familiarity rather than actual memory of the crime.
- Show-up Procedures: A "show-up" involves presenting a single suspect to a witness shortly after a crime. While sometimes necessary due to time constraints, show-ups are inherently more suggestive than lineups. Strict guidelines should be followed, including strong admonitions to the witness that the person may not be the perpetrator and recording the witness's immediate confidence.
Impact and Best Practices
The deliberate application of best practices for system variables is fundamental to enhancing the integrity of eyewitness evidence. These practices are often supported by extensive psychological research and have been advocated by organizations like the Innocence Project and the American Psychological Association (APA) to prevent miscarriages of justice. Many law enforcement agencies now adopt guidelines like those suggested by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ).
The table below summarizes key system variables and their associated best practices and potential risks:
| System Variable | Best Practice | Potential Risk (if not followed) |
|---|---|---|
| Witness Questioning | Use open-ended questions, cognitive interview techniques, avoid leading questions. | Contaminated memory, inaccurate recall, introduction of false details. |
| Lineup Administration | Double-blind procedure, clear pre-lineup instructions (perpetrator may or may not be present). | Administrator's unconscious cues, false confidence, pressure to identify, incorrect identification. |
| Lineup Construction | Select similar fillers, avoid suspect standing out, sequential presentation. | Suspect appears unique, increasing risk of misidentification; relative judgment errors. |
| Confidence Statement | Document confidence at the time of initial identification. | Post-identification factors inflate confidence, less reliable evidence in court. |
| Mugshot/Show-up Procedures | Avoid suggestive presentations, use only when necessary with caution and strict protocols. | Increased suggestibility, higher risk of false identification due to familiarity or pressure. |
Conclusion
These system variables highlight how proper protocols can significantly safeguard the integrity of eyewitness testimony, strengthening the fairness and accuracy of the criminal justice system. By adhering to evidence-based practices, law enforcement and legal professionals can minimize the inherent risks associated with human memory and perception, thereby improving justice outcomes.
