Ora

What is the Difference Between Copyright and Copyleft?

Published in Intellectual Property Rights 4 mins read

The fundamental difference between copyright and copyleft lies in their intent regarding the use and distribution of creative works: copyright restricts unauthorized use and promotes proprietary control, while copyleft uses copyright law to ensure that works remain free and open for modification and distribution.

Understanding Copyright

Copyright is a legal right that grants creators exclusive control over their original works of authorship. This right enables the creator to prevent unauthorized copying or selling of their work. It aims to protect the economic interests of creators by giving them the sole right to:

  • Reproduce the work.
  • Distribute copies of the work.
  • Perform or display the work publicly.
  • Create derivative works based on the original.

Key Aspects of Copyright:

  • Automatic Protection: Copyright protection generally arises automatically upon the creation of an original work fixed in a tangible medium.
  • Duration: Protection typically lasts for the life of the author plus a significant number of years (e.g., 70 years in many jurisdictions).
  • Scope: Applies to a wide range of creative expressions, including software, literature, music, art, and architectural designs.
  • Default State: Without a specific license, a work is implicitly copyrighted, meaning all rights are reserved by the creator.

For more detailed information, you can refer to resources like the U.S. Copyright Office.

Understanding Copyleft

Copyleft is not an absence of copyright; rather, it is a method that harnesses copyright law to achieve the opposite effect of conventional copyright. It is primarily used within the open-source community, particularly for software and documentation. Copyleft licenses allow individuals to modify the software or documentation and distribute it back to the open-source community, ensuring that all subsequent versions also remain free and open.

How Copyleft Works:

Copyleft licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL), contain specific terms that:

  • Grant users freedom to run, study, modify, and distribute the work.
  • Require derivative works to be distributed under the same or compatible copyleft license. This "share-alike" clause prevents recipients from making the modified version proprietary.
  • Mandate access to source code for software.

Key Aspects of Copyleft:

  • Freedom and Openness: Promotes collaboration, innovation, and the free exchange of knowledge.
  • Perpetual Openness: Ensures that any improvements or modifications to the work remain accessible and modifiable by others.
  • Community-Driven: Fosters a vibrant community of developers and users who contribute to and benefit from the shared resources.

Copyright vs. Copyleft: A Direct Comparison

The table below highlights the core distinctions between copyright and copyleft:

Feature Copyright (Proprietary/Closed Source) Copyleft (Open Source)
Primary Goal Restrict unauthorized use and maintain exclusive control. Ensure freedom to use, modify, and distribute, using copyright law to do so.
Default State All rights reserved unless explicitly stated otherwise. Rights are explicitly granted, but with conditions to maintain openness.
Control Creator retains maximum control over their work. Control is decentralized; freedom is granted to users, with a "share-alike" obligation.
Modification Typically requires permission from the copyright holder. Actively encourages modification and improvement.
Distribution Generally restricted; requires license or permission. Freely allowed, provided the same license terms apply to derivatives.
Revenue Model Often tied to selling licenses or copies of the work. Revenue typically comes from services, support, or complementary products.
Examples Microsoft Windows, Adobe Photoshop, most commercial books and music. Linux operating system, WordPress, GIMP, VLC Media Player.

Practical Implications and Relationship

While seemingly opposite, copyleft fundamentally relies on copyright law. Without copyright, there would be no legal framework for copyleft licenses to enforce their "share-alike" and freedom-preserving clauses. Copyleft effectively uses the legal teeth of copyright to ensure that a work remains open and free, rather than becoming proprietary.

  • For Creators:
    • Copyright is chosen when creators want to monetize their work directly through sales, licensing, or maintain tight control over its evolution and branding.
    • Copyleft is chosen when creators prioritize collaboration, community contribution, and the long-term freedom and availability of their work.
  • For Users:
    • Using copyrighted software or content often means agreeing to restrictive End-User License Agreements (EULAs) that limit usage, modification, and redistribution.
    • Using copylefted software or content provides inherent freedoms, allowing users to inspect the code, customize it, and even redistribute modified versions, provided they adhere to the copyleft terms.

In essence, copyright aims to privatize and control, while copyleft aims to socialize and liberate, both operating within the same legal framework.