Ora

What is a Pull Plan in Construction?

Published in Lean Construction Planning 6 mins read

A pull plan in construction is a collaborative and visual planning method that organizes tasks by working backward from a defined project milestone or completion date. It serves as an alternative planning method to traditional approaches like the Critical Path Method (CPM), gaining popularity because it actively involves the entire project team in the scheduling process, rather than relying on a single planner. This methodology is central to Lean Construction principles, focusing on delivering value and eliminating waste.


The Core Idea Behind Pull Planning

Unlike conventional scheduling, which often pushes tasks forward based on a predetermined sequence, pull planning "pulls" the necessary work into existence. This means the team identifies the ultimate goal or a major milestone and then collaboratively determines the preceding tasks required to achieve that goal, day by day or week by week. This backward scheduling approach ensures that only necessary work is performed, minimizing overproduction and optimizing resource allocation.

How Pull Planning Works: The Process

Pull planning sessions are typically highly visual and interactive, often taking place in a dedicated room with whiteboards, sticky notes, and a diverse group of stakeholders.

Key Steps in a Pull Planning Session:

  1. Define the End Goal/Milestone: The team starts by clearly identifying the final project completion date or a significant milestone (e.g., "Building Enclosed," "Flooring Complete"). This is the "pull" point.
  2. Identify Last Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCAs): For the chosen milestone, the team lists the very last activities that must be completed to achieve it.
  3. Work Backward, Task by Task: For each identified task, the team asks: "What must be finished immediately before this task can start?" This process continues, layer by layer, until all necessary preceding activities for the milestone are mapped out.
  4. Define Hand-offs and Dependencies: As tasks are identified, the team explicitly marks hand-offs between different trades or teams and notes critical dependencies.
  5. Assign Ownership and Durations: Each task is assigned to a specific team or individual, and a realistic duration is estimated.
  6. Identify and Address Constraints: A crucial part of the process is pinpointing any constraints (e.g., material availability, equipment, information, permits) that could prevent a task from starting or finishing. These are then actively addressed and resolved.
  7. Commitment and Sign-off: Teams commit to completing their assigned tasks by the agreed-upon dates. This shared commitment fosters accountability.
  8. Link to Master Schedule: The detailed pull plan (often covering a 4-6 week look-ahead) is then integrated with and supports the overarching master project schedule.

Benefits of Implementing Pull Planning

Pull planning offers several advantages that contribute to more efficient and predictable project delivery:

  • Enhanced Team Collaboration and Ownership: By involving all relevant stakeholders, including subcontractors and frontline workers, pull planning leverages their expertise and fosters a sense of shared ownership and accountability for the schedule. This collective input ensures a more realistic and achievable plan.
  • Improved Workflow and Lean Principles: It aligns with Lean Construction by focusing on value stream mapping, reducing waste (e.g., waiting time, unnecessary inventory, over-processing), and promoting a continuous flow of work.
  • Increased Predictability: The backward planning approach, coupled with active constraint identification, helps to anticipate potential issues before they become critical, leading to a more stable and predictable workflow.
  • Better Constraint Identification and Resolution: The collaborative nature quickly highlights obstacles, allowing the team to proactively find solutions and prevent delays.
  • Visual Management: The physical board with sticky notes provides a clear, real-time visual representation of the project status, making it easy for anyone to understand progress and upcoming tasks.
  • Reduced Rework: By thoroughly planning the sequence and dependencies, the likelihood of errors and subsequent rework is minimized.

Pull Planning vs. Critical Path Method (CPM)

While both pull planning and CPM are scheduling methodologies, they approach project planning from fundamentally different perspectives:

Feature Pull Planning Critical Path Method (CPM)
Approach Backward-looking: Starts from a milestone and defines preceding tasks. Forward-looking: Starts from the project's beginning and defines successors.
Team Involvement High: Involves the entire team, including trades and superintendents. Lower: Typically managed by a single planner or project manager.
Focus Flow, eliminating waste, collaborative commitment, constraint resolution. Identifying the longest sequence of tasks (critical path) and total project duration.
Flexibility Highly adaptable to changes; designed for continuous adjustment and learning. More rigid; changes can require significant recalculations of the critical path.
Tools Whiteboards, sticky notes, visual aids, digital apps for collaboration. Project management software (e.g., Primavera P6, Microsoft Project).
Primary Use Detailed short-term planning (e.g., 4-6 week look-ahead), task coordination. High-level master schedule, overall project duration, resource leveling.
Relation Often used in conjunction with CPM to detail specific phases or look-ahead plans. Forms the backbone of the master project schedule.

Pull planning is an alternative planning method that is a substitute for the Critical Path Method (CPM), and its growing popularity stems from its inclusive, team-oriented approach compared to the single-person focus of CPM.

Practical Insights and Best Practices

To maximize the effectiveness of pull planning:

  • Dedicated Facilitator: A skilled facilitator is crucial to guide discussions, maintain focus, and ensure active participation from all team members.
  • Consistent Cadence: Hold regular, scheduled pull planning sessions (e.g., weekly or bi-weekly) to maintain momentum and adapt to evolving project conditions.
  • Visual Workspace: Ensure a large, accessible space with whiteboards, markers, and plenty of sticky notes in different colors to represent various trades or task types.
  • Go-See, Go-Do: Encourage team members to physically visit the work site to visualize tasks and constraints, fostering a deeper understanding.
  • Digital Tools: While physical boards are excellent for collaboration, consider integrating digital pull planning tools like those offered by Project Management Software providers to capture, track, and share the plan electronically.
  • Link to Last Planner System: Pull planning is a key component of the Last Planner System (LPS), which provides a framework for reliable workflow, learning, and continuous improvement.

Example Scenario

Imagine a construction team planning the interior finishing phase of a commercial building. Instead of starting with "install drywall," they start with the milestone "Project Handover Ready" and then work backward:

  1. Project Handover Ready (Target Date: Oct 30)
  2. Preceded by: Final Clean, Punch List Complete (Oct 28)
  3. Preceded by: Paint Touch-ups, Final Electrical/Plumbing Fixture Install (Oct 25)
  4. Preceded by: Finish Flooring Install, Final Trim/Millwork Install (Oct 20)
  5. Preceded by: First Coat Paint, Cabinet Install, Door Install (Oct 15)
  6. Preceded by: Drywall Finish (Taping, Mudding, Sanding), Rough-in Inspections Passed (Oct 10)
  7. Preceded by: Drywall Install, Rough-in Electrical/Plumbing/HVAC Complete (Oct 5)

During this process, specific subcontractors for painting, flooring, electrical, etc., would identify their tasks, durations, and critical predecessors, while also flagging any constraints like "awaiting custom millwork delivery" or "need final approval on paint colors." This collaborative effort creates a robust, achievable plan.


By embracing pull planning, construction teams can achieve greater alignment, reduce inefficiencies, and deliver projects more predictably and reliably.