No, How It Ends is generally not considered a good movie by critics. It received a largely negative reception upon its release.
Critical Reception of How It Ends
The consensus among many reviewers indicates that the film struggles to deliver a satisfying experience. Initially, it's often described as a mediocre post-apocalyptic movie. However, its quality reportedly degrades significantly as it progresses, ultimately becoming a downright horrible viewing experience.
The primary point of contention and the major reason for its poor reception centers on its plot development, or rather, the lack thereof. Critics frequently highlight the movie's refusal to provide any semblance of meaningful answers about its central mystery. This leaves viewers with an unsatisfying and unfulfilling narrative, undermining any potential intrigue or tension built in the earlier parts of the film.
Why Viewers Are Often Disappointed
How It Ends attempts to build suspense around a mysterious apocalyptic event. However, by the conclusion, the film leaves many crucial questions unanswered, which can be a significant letdown for audiences expecting a coherent resolution or at least some clarity. This lack of explanation contributes heavily to its negative evaluation.
In summary, while some might find individual performances or initial premise interesting, the overall consensus points to How It Ends being a poorly executed film that fails to deliver on its premise, particularly due to its ambiguous and unsatisfying ending.
| Aspect of the Film | Critical Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Overall Quality | Not good; widely considered poor. |
| Initial Impression | Mediocre |
| Later Development | Downright horrible |
| Main Criticism | Refusal to provide meaningful answers about its central mystery. |
