Public access to the top floors of Tate Modern, specifically its viewing platform, is restricted due to a ruling by the U.K.'s Supreme Court. The court determined that the viewing platform constituted a "clear case of nuisance," impacting the privacy of nearby residents.
The Supreme Court's Nuisance Ruling
The legal challenge centered on the viewing platform, which offered panoramic views of London but also overlooked neighboring residential properties. The U.K.'s Supreme Court concluded that this situation amounted to a "nuisance" to the residents. Following this ruling, the matter was referred to a High Court to determine the appropriate resolution.
Tate Modern's Compliance and Restricted Access
Initially, there were concerns that the viewing platform might face permanent closure. However, to comply with the court's decision, Tate Modern opted for a different approach: restricting public access to the area. This measure allows the museum to operate the platform while mitigating the nuisance issues identified by the court, avoiding a complete closure. The museum has therefore complied with the ruling by implementing these access limitations.
- Key Reason: A Supreme Court ruling declared the viewing platform a "clear case of nuisance."
- Resolution: Instead of permanent closure, Tate Modern implemented restricted public access.
- Outcome: The platform was reopened, but with limitations on who can access it or how it can be used, ensuring compliance with the court's judgment.
