Ora

Why is Pluto no longer considered a planet?

Published in Planetary Classification 3 mins read

Pluto is no longer considered a full-sized planet because it does not meet all three criteria established by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) for defining a planet, specifically failing to clear its orbital neighborhood of other objects.

The International Astronomical Union's Definition

In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU), the globally recognized authority for naming celestial bodies and defining astronomical terms, established a clear definition for what constitutes a "planet" within our solar system. This definition outlined three specific criteria that a celestial body must meet to be classified as a full-sized planet:

  1. It is in orbit around the Sun.
  2. It has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape).
  3. It has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.

Why Pluto Did Not Meet the Criteria

Pluto fulfills the first two criteria: it successfully orbits the Sun, and it is massive enough for its own gravity to pull it into a nearly spherical shape. However, Pluto fails to meet the third and crucial criterion: it has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.

  • Understanding "Cleared the Neighborhood": This criterion means that a planet must be gravitationally dominant in its orbital zone, either having absorbed or ejected most other significant objects within its path. The eight recognized planets in our solar system have orbits that are largely free of other large debris.
  • Pluto's Orbital Environment: Pluto resides within the Kuiper Belt, a vast ring of icy bodies and dwarf planets extending beyond Neptune's orbit. Unlike the orbits of the eight recognized planets, Pluto's path is shared with numerous other significant objects, including other dwarf planets and countless smaller icy bodies. This indicates that Pluto has not gravitationally "cleared" its orbital path.

The Rise of Dwarf Planets

The IAU introduced the category of "dwarf planet" to classify celestial bodies like Pluto that meet the first two criteria of a planet (orbiting the Sun and being nearly round) but fail the third (clearing their orbital neighborhood). This reclassification aimed to create a more precise and consistent understanding of objects within our solar system, especially as astronomers discovered more large objects in the Kuiper Belt (such as Eris, which is more massive than Pluto).

The decision led to a clearer distinction between the eight "classical" planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune) and other large, round objects orbiting the Sun that coexist with other significant bodies in their orbital paths.

Feature Full-Sized Planet Dwarf Planet
Orbits the Sun Yes Yes
Nearly Round Yes Yes
Cleared Orbit Yes (Gravitationally dominant in its orbital zone) No (Shares its orbital neighborhood with other objects)
Examples Earth, Jupiter, Mars Pluto, Eris, Ceres, Makemake, Haumea

This reclassification reflects the evolution of our scientific understanding of the solar system as new discoveries are made and more rigorous definitions become necessary.

Learn more about planetary definitions on NASA's website