Ora

What is the difference between RACI and DACI?

Published in Project Management Frameworks 4 mins read

The fundamental difference between RACI and DACI lies in their primary focus: RACI is a model for assigning task responsibilities, while DACI is designed for decision-making processes. While RACI identifies who is responsible for completing specific tasks, DACI is used to determine the course of action for a particular task or function. Essentially, RACI defines who does what, whereas DACI defines who decides what.

Understanding RACI: Defining Task Execution Roles

The RACI matrix is a popular tool for clarifying and communicating roles and responsibilities in projects or processes. Each letter represents a specific role:

  • R - Responsible: The person(s) who do the work to complete the task. There can be multiple Responsible individuals for a single task.
  • A - Accountable: The one person ultimately answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the task. This person approves the work completed by the Responsible party. There can only be one Accountable person per task.
  • C - Consulted: Individuals whose opinions are sought, typically subject matter experts. This is a two-way communication.
  • I - Informed: Individuals who need to be kept up-to-date on progress or decisions. This is typically a one-way communication.

Key Applications of RACI:

  • Task Management: Ensuring clarity on who is performing a task and who is answerable for it.
  • Process Improvement: Identifying bottlenecks or unclear responsibilities within workflows.
  • Project Planning: Assigning roles for various project deliverables.

Understanding DACI: Structuring Decision-Making

The DACI framework, on the other hand, is specifically designed to clarify roles in the decision-making process, especially for complex or strategic decisions. The roles are:

  • D - Driver: The person who manages the decision process, facilitates discussions, and ensures the decision is made and implemented. They are often the project manager or team lead.
  • A - Approver: The one person who has the final authority to make the decision. They are ultimately accountable for the outcome of the decision.
  • C - Contributors: Individuals who provide input, data, and recommendations critical to making an informed decision. They are typically experts or stakeholders.
  • I - Informed: Those who need to be notified of the decision once it has been made, but do not provide input during the process.

Key Applications of DACI:

  • Strategic Decisions: Defining roles for major company choices, product development directions, or market entry strategies.
  • Project Initiation: Determining the scope, budget, and key objectives of new projects.
  • Policy Formulation: Establishing clear lines of authority for creating and approving new organizational policies.

A Comparative Overview: RACI vs. DACI

While both models aim to clarify roles and improve efficiency, their focus distinguishes them. The table below highlights their core differences:

Feature RACI DACI
Primary Focus Task execution and responsibility Decision-making and resolution
Goal Clarify who completes specific tasks Define who decides a course of action
"A" Role Accountable (for task completion) Approver (for the decision)
"D" Role N/A Driver (facilitates the decision)
Typical Use Project tasks, operational processes Strategic decisions, project scope

How RACI and DACI Intersect

It's important to note that these models are not mutually exclusive; they can complement each other. For instance, it is well within the scope of RACI to identify the overall responsibility matrix that DACI will perform under. This means that a RACI matrix might define the broad responsibilities of teams or individuals, within which specific DACI processes can then be applied for particular decisions.

Practical Examples:

  • Product Development:

    • DACI might be used to decide on the new features for a product (e.g., Driver: Product Manager, Approver: VP of Product, Contributors: Engineering Lead, Design Lead, Marketing Lead, Informed: Sales Team).
    • Once the features are decided, RACI would then be applied to the specific tasks required to develop those features (e.g., who is Responsible for coding a feature, who is Accountable for its quality, who to Consult for technical challenges, who to Inform about progress).
  • Budget Approval:

    • DACI clarifies who is the Driver for the budget proposal, who is the ultimate Approver, who Contributes with financial data, and who is Informed of the final budget.
    • After the budget is approved, RACI could then be used to define who is Responsible for managing specific budget line items, who is Accountable for expenditure tracking, and so on.

By understanding the distinct purposes and applications of RACI and DACI, organizations can select the most appropriate framework, or combine them strategically, to enhance clarity, improve accountability, and streamline operations and decision-making processes.